|
|
DonJuan wrote:
Am I the only one who has the balls to say it??? No, just the only one foolish enough.
You don't like turn-based games, good for you. On the other hand, plenty of other people like them just fine. The nice thing about a free market, is as long as those people are around, you can whine all you want but they'll still get their games. If you can't understand why anyone could possibly enjoy turn-based games, do yourself a favour and stick to your 'thrills'.
Personally, while I don't find turn based games as tense as realtime ones, they can certainly be a lot more suspenseful at times, as anyone who's said to themselves, "just one more turn", can attest.
They also offer other benefits, especially when it comes to simultaneous turn-based games, allowing players to play much larger games then they might otherwise. I used to play in 16 player games of Stars!, that would last at a turn a day for months. Combined, the time spent playing the entire game would have taken an entire day at least. How often can you get the same 16 players to commit to even a 4h game?
There's also of course the unlimited thinking time bit, hence turn-based being suited for games that require more than a split-second of thought.
Just because you don't like them does not somehow negate the fact that turn-based is better suited to some types of games, while real-time is better suited to others.
(As an aside, I just recently came across Knights Of Honor, which does good job of bringing the slower pace of turn-based games into realtime... and yet oddly enough, it was more boring... I suppose you can chalk up another point for turn-based... if you don't want to wait, you can always just keep tapping the next turn key :)
|